MCCARTHY: Leak Investigations, Journalists, and Double Standards

 

It is an interesting contrast.

 

The media are in a lather over the Justice Department’s grand-jury investigation of contacts between several reporters and a government source — the former Senate Intelligence Committee security director who has been indicted for lying to investigators about his leaks to the press.

 

The same media are in a lather over the refusal of the president of the United States, at least thus far, to submit to questioning by the special counsel in the Russia investigation. The president is placing himself “above the law,” they contend, if he rebuffs prosecutors or defies a grand-jury subpoena.

Whether we’re talking about journalists or presidents, the situation is the same: An investigative demand is made on people whose jobs are so important to the functioning of our self-governing republic that they are given some protection, but not absolute immunity, from the obligation to provide evidence to the grand jury.

 

And whether it’s a reporter or the chief executive, the question is: Under what circumstances should they be forced to testify?

 

The oddity — a very human oddity — is that the press is extraordinarily attuned to its own need for protection, but scoffs at the notion that someone with greater responsibilities should have comparable protections.

 

Read More: https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/06/james-wolfe-leak-investigation-journalists-double-standard/

 

Share SHARE

Tags: ,

Comments are closed.